Interactions and Outcomes

Interactions and Outcomes

Compliance Council Improvement Proposal (CCIP) Process

The process used by the Compliance Council to veto Miner Council proposals, develop authorizations and conflict resolution procedures, and to authorize participants into positions of authority on the platform.

Overview

The following section describes the context and procedure encompassed by the Compliance Council Improvement Proposal (CCIP) process. The CCIP process is used by the Compliance Council to (1) veto Miner Council Improvement Proposals (2) develop authorizations and conflict resolution processes (3) and to authorize participants into positions of authority in Telcoin Platform governance

CCIP: Proposal Authors
CCIP: Voters
CCIP: Implementation units

Compliance Council

The Compliance Council is a special-purpose governing body that crosses jurisdictions of the Platform’s governance system to ensure proposal compliance with governance rules and laws, authorize new miners, develops legal and organizational entities, monitors and enforces governance rules, and serves a low cost means to conflict resolution.

CCIP: Decision-making Rules and Authority

CouncilRepresentationProcess and Domain of AuthorityDecision-making Rules




Compliance Council		Compliance Council
· Members: 4
· Representation: Balanced across all four Miner Groups.
Compliance Improvement Proposal (CCIP)

Authority
• Veto authority over all Miner Council proposals
• Compliance,
• Legal and Organizational,
• Conflict Resolution,
• Actor Authorizations		Proposal Authority: TAO, Compliance Council

Approval: 3 out of 4
Quorum: 75%
Duration: 72 hours
Channel: telcoincompliancecouncil.eth
CCIP: Authority Rules

CCIP: Interactions and Outcomes

CCIP: Processes Overview

The CCIP process may be used by the Compliance Council to (1) veto Miner Council improvement proposals, (2) to authorize new participants into positions on the Platform, (3) introduce and improve conflict resolution and authorizations processes. Each proposal type differs in terms of procedural requirements.

CCIP Veto Process

The following process is used by the Compliance Council to veto Miner Council improvement proposals (e.g. a TIP, TELIP, TELxIP, or TANIP).

  • CCIP Proposal: At any point during the IP process and up to 72 hours after the Miner Council IP is affirmed by the relevant Miner Councils, a Compliance Council or Telcoin Foundation member submits a proposal to veto the Improvement Proposal to the Compliance Council Snapshot.
  • Compliance Council Vote: The Compliance Council must vote to veto the proposal within 72 hours after it is approved by the relevant Councils, or else the proposal will be approved. The Compliance Council members who vote to veto the proposal, must provide their rationale and feedback at the time of the vote.
    • Approval (Veto) Rate: 3/4
    • Quorum: 75%
    • Duration: 72 hours (3 days)
  • Implementation: If the proposal is approved, the following actions take place
  • Social: The relevant Councils either implement the improvement or works with the TAO or other third parties to implement the update.
  • TEL Transfers: TEL is transferred from the relevant Council Safe to the intended address as a result of the affirmation of the proposal.
  • Documentation: The Proposal Author from the relevant Council coordinates with the TAO to update Telcoin.org IP documentation.
    • Veto: Outcomes and Feedback
    Veto: Evaluative Criteria

    CCIP Authorizations Procedure

    Authorizations Process

    The following CCIP process is used by the Compliance Council to authorize new Miners(where applicable), Council Members, and operational contributors.

  • Forum Proposal: The prospective participant submits an authorization proposal to the respective authorizations channel on the Telcoin Forum.
  • Compliance Council Proposal: A Compliance Council or Telcoin Foundation member submits the authorizations proposal to the Compliance Council snapshot for voting.
  • Compliance Council Vote: Within 72 hours of submission, the Compliance Council votes to either approve or reject the prospective participant.
    • Approval Rate: 3/4
    • Quorum Rate: 75%
    • Duration: 72 hours
  • Authorization(or rejection): The new participant is either approved or rejected.
  • Documentation: The proposal author from the Compliance Council coordinates with the Foundation to update Telcoin.org authorizations documentation.
    • Authorizations: Outcomes and Feedback
    Authorizations: Evaluative Criteria

    CCIP Process Development Procedure

    The following CCIP process is used by the Compliance Council to develop, alter and implement authorizations and conflict resolutions processes and systems.

  • Forum Proposal: A forum member submits the CCIP proposal to the CCIP channel on the Telcoin Forum.
  • Compliance Council Proposal: A Compliance Council or Telcoin Foundation member submits the CCIP proposal to the Compliance Council snapshot.
  • Compliance Council Vote: Within 72 hours of submission, the Compliance Council votes to either approve or reject the proposal
  • Implementation: If the proposal is approved, the Compliance Council implements on its own, with the Telcoin Foundation, or another party as outlined in the proposal.
  • Documentation: The proposal author from the Compliance Council coordinates with the Foundation to update Telcoin.org documentation.
    • Process Development: Outcomes and Feedback
    Process Development: Evaluative Criteria