Interactions and Outcomes
Interactions and Outcomes
TEL Improvement Proposal (TELIP)
The process used by the Platform and Treasury Councils to set, enforce and refine the rules related to the TEL Treasury, Telcoin Network, governance infrastructure, the Telcoin Association, and all other platform-wide policies.
Overview
The following section describes the context and procedure encompassed by the TEL Improvement Proposal (TELIP), the process used by the Platform and Treasury Councils to set, enforce and refine the rules related to the TEL Treasury and token, Telcoin Network, and all other platform-wide policies.
TELIP Proposal Authors
TELIP Voters
TELIP Implementation units
TELIP: Authority and Decision-making Rules
Councils | Representation | Process, Domain of Authority | Decision-making Rules |
---|---|---|---|
Platform Council, Treasury Council | Platform Council · Members: 8 · Representation: Balanced across all four Miner Groups. Treasury Council · Members: 4 · Representation: Balanced across all four Miner Groups. | TEL Improvement Proposal (TELIP) Platform-wide rules that involve the TEL Treasury, TEL token contract, Telcoin Network, the Telcoin Association Constitution, and governance infrastructure. | 1. Platform Council: Must approve before submitting to the Treasury Council Approval: 6 out of 8 Quorum: 100% Duration: 120 hours Channel: telcoinplatformcouncil.eth 2. Treasury Council: Must vote after the Platform Council has affirmed. Approval: 4 out of 4 Quorum: 100% Duration: 72 hours Channel: telcointreasurycouncil.eth |
TELIP: Authority Rules
TELIP Process and Outcomes
- Approval Rate: 6/8
- Duration: 120 hours (5 days)
- Approval Rate: 4/4
- Duration: 72 hours or 3 days
- Approval (Veto) Rate: 3/4
- Duration: 72 hours (3 days)
- Off-Chain: The Platform Council, Treasury Council, or Compliance Council either implements the proposal itself or works with the TAO or other third parties to implement the update.
- TEL Transfers: TEL is transferred from the Treasury Wallet to the intended address as a result of the affirmation of the proposal.
Outcomes
Evaluative Criteria
Consistency with Shared Values: Is the proposed improvement consistent with the the Mission, Vision, Values defined in Article 4.1 (a-c) of the Telcoin Association Constitution?
Feasibility: Technical, Economic, Financial, Legal, Political
General Performance Indicators: Staked TEL, actors, volume, fees
Sustainability: Can the quantity of TEL issuance units distributed from the TEL Treasury according to issuance distribution rules sustain at current levels over time?
Participation: To what extent are (1) the community of miners and (2) the Platform, Treasury Councils and its members participating in co-production and deliberation processes?
Economic Efficiency: How economically efficient is the proposed improvement as measured by the magnitude of the change in the flow of net benefits associated with an allocation or reallocation of resources?
Legitimacy: Do miners view the deliberation process undertaken by the Platform and Treasury Councils related to a particular TELIP as legitimate?
Proportional Equivalence: Are TEL Treasury distribution levels suitable to Platform conditions? Are the benefits obtained by miners proportional to the amount of inputs required in the form of labor, material, or money?
Accountability: Are the Platform, Treasury Council and their members accountable to Miner Groups concerning the policies and rules they choose?